Monday, October 31, 2011

FW: What about all these churches?

Veith and McCain…

 

Feed: Cranach: The Blog of Veith
Posted on: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:16 AM
Author: Gene Veith
Subject: What about all these churches?

 

Reformation Day is nothing to celebrate, according to some Christians.  It marks the day Christianity was shattered into countless little sects.  We need to find unity rather than revel in things that divide us.  Luther's breaking away from what was then one Church was a tragedy.

First of all, Luther didn't break away from the Church.  He was excommunicated!  There is a big difference.  Secondly, the Church did need reforming.  Even the Church of Rome came to admit that, finally coming to grips with the financial and moral corruption that had become rife in late medieval Christianity.  If there were no Reformation, there would have been no Counter-Reformation.

As for all of the subsequent church bodies, Paul McCain, in a Reformation Day meditation, offers a useful taxonomy:

Another point that confuses many people is the fact that there are so many different churches to choose from. It is an awful mess, so it seems. Yes, it can be confusing, but it really is not as complicated as some would think, or want to maintain. Up until the year 1054 there was basically one unified Christian church, distinct from a number of non-Christian or anti-Christian heretical groups. In 1054 the church divided into Eastern and Western Christianity. By the time of the late Middle Ages the Western Church, which had come to be known as the Roman Catholic Church, had reached a point of deep corruption, most importantly in what it believed, but also in the morals and life of the clergy and church leadership. In 1517 there began what we know today as the Reformation, when Martin Luther, a professor and monk in Wittenberg, Germany posted a series of "talking points" on the practice of selling "indulgences" by which people were led to believe they could buy forgiveness of sins, for their dead relatives in purgatory. A person has to decide is the Lutheran view of Christianity is correct, or the Roman Catholic view is correct.

After the Reformation, many groups developed from the teachings of persons other than Martin Luther, most notably, two men: Ulrich Zwingli and John Calvin, who did much of his work in Geneva. These two men and their writings gave rise to many churches that can be traced back to and grouped under the general category of "Reformed" churches. In America in the 19th and 20th century there arose many splinter groups from Reformed churches, these would include "Charismatic" and "Pentecostal" groups, along with groups that rejected all denominations and became, in effect, a denomination of their own, the so-called "non-denominational" churches. And so the question then becomes, "Is Lutheran theology correct, or Reformed theology correct?" So, is it Rome or Wittenberg. If Wittenberg, then is it Geneva or Wittenberg?" Once those decisions are made, the myriad of denominations today makes a lot more sense.

But there is an additional challenge unique to our century and more so the past half-century. Today, despite all their denominational differences and historic confessions, the vast majority of Christian churches in Protestantism have been nearly overwhelmed by the rise of liberal Christianity. This unites them more so than any other feature of their confession of faith. Historic differences are no longer regarded as divisive since these divisions were based on one group's understanding of the Biblical text as opposed to another group's understanding of the Bible. For example, the difference between Lutheran and Reformed views of the Lord's Supper are very important and based on very serious and clear differences in how the words Jesus spoke at the Last Supper are understood. Liberalism however regards the words of Jesus in the Bible as unreliable. It teaches that we can not be sure that what is recorded in the Bible is true and accurate, therefore, there is no point in being "dogmatic" about much of anything having to do with the Bible. Modern liberalism has swept through all Christian denominations, Lutheran Reformed, Protestant and Roman Catholic.

via The Festival of the Reformation: October 31 – Does Being Lutheran Still Matter? | CyberBrethren-A Lutheran Blog.

So one must decide if Rome was right, or if Wittenberg was right?  (Or, before that, I suppose, if Constantinople was right.)  If Luther was right to post those theses, the next decision is whether Wittenberg or Geneva was right.  And then, I suppose, a choice between a number of other places (Canterbury?  New Bedford?  Plymouth, Massachusetts?  Upstate New York?  Chicago?  Azusa Street?)

But now EVERYBODY also must decide between conservative theology and the new (and unifying) liberal theology.


View article...

FW: Grasp These Words or Die in Your Sins – The Significance of the Reformation

Harrison…

 

Feed: Cyberbrethren Lutheran Blog Feed
Posted on: Monday, October 31, 2011 5:07 PM
Author: Paul T. McCain
Subject: Grasp These Words or Die in Your Sins – The Significance of the Reformation

 

An excellent sermon for the Reformation of the Church, preached by Pastor Matthew Harrison, President of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod.

"If the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed."


View article...

Enclosures:

pgxprk60mwM (3 KB)
http://www.youtube.com/v/pgxprk60mwM?version=3&feature=oembed

 

FW: The Gospel For Those Broken By The Church–for free

Rosenbladt…

 

Feed: Cranach: The Blog of Veith
Posted on: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:31 AM
Author: Gene Veith
Subject: The Gospel For Those Broken By The Church–for free

 

Rod Rosenbladt, emeritus professor at Concordia-Irvine and a co-host at the White Horse Inn radio program, has a presentation that has become a classic, with tapes and transcripts passed from hand to hand like samizdat novels in the former Soviet Union.  It's called "The Gospel for Those Broken by the Church."   Many, MANY have found it a lifesaver, indeed, a proclamation of the Gospel that is so powerful that they have come to faith.  Even long-time veterans–and casualties–of churches have come to understand through this presentation the full magnitude of the Gospel, with many embracing it for the first time.  It's featured in a sidebar on this blog as being available from New Reformation Press.

Well, now New Reformation Press, with the support of South Orange County Outreach and Faith Lutheran Church in Capistrano, California, is making this this presentation available FOR FREE.   You can download it as an mp3 file, as a written transcript, or as a video!

I've heard Dr. Rosenbladt give this message in person and it blew me away, so hard-hitting and effective and pastoral it is, giving such comfort to troubled souls and making so real the full implications of Christ's Gospel.  You want an example of evangelism?  Here it is.  It is addressed specifically to the casualties of American Christianity, to those who have become burnt out, disillusioned, and despairing due to the pressures, expectations, and culture of so many of our churches.

Listening to this presentation would be an excellent Reformation day observance.  In both its proclamation of the all-sufficient work of Christ and in its critique of churches that neglect that message, it captures what the Reformation was–and is–all about.

Get it or view the video here:   New Reformation Press » The Gospel For Those Broken By The Church.


View article...

Sunday, October 30, 2011

FW: Reformation Thoughts...

Consider…

 

Feed: Pastoral Meanderings
Posted on: Sunday, October 30, 2011 5:38 PM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (Pastor Peters)
Subject: Reformation Thoughts...

 

If the Holy Trinity was as holy as the Trinitarian dogma taught; if original sin was as virulent as the Augustinian tradition said it was; and if Christ was as necessary as the Christological dogma implied—then the only way to treat justification in a manner faithful to the best of Catholic tradition was to teach justification by faith.

With these words, Jaroslav Pelikan addresses the Reformation not as some blip on the radar of church history or some terrible detour to a once straight path but the true expression of catholicity.  At this time of year, Lutherans often speak of their glorious heritage of reform and renewal as if our history began on this date in 1517.  Luther would strongly object to a characterization of the Reformation movement as sectarian.  Luther would bristle at the thought that he stood for some fringe opinion out of the mainstream of Christian thought and faith.  Yet today that is exactly the impression some Lutherans want to give.  We act as if our history began with a hammer and a nail and a church door and that nothing much happened in the fifteen centuries before that moment in time.  Sometimes we are even more parochial and point to much more recent dates as the start of the true history of the Church (say 1839 and a few ships sailing from Saxony).

Existing side by side in pre-Reformation theology were several ways of interpreting the righteousness of God and the act of justification. They ranged from strongly moralistic views that seemed to equate justification with moral renewal to ultra-forensic views, which saw justification as a 'nude imputation' that seemed possible apart from Christ, by an arbitrary decree of God. Between these extremes were many combinations; and though certain views predominated in late nominalism, it is not possible even there to speak of a single doctrine of justification.



Newman was right in saying that doctrine develops but the doctrine that develops is doctrine gone awry.  At the time the seeds of the Reformation were being planted, the doctrine of justification was developing -- not just ways of expressing the one truth of the Christ event but actual different theologies that competed and often conflicted.  What happened in the Reformation was not the start of something new but the course correction that reclaimed what was old and true and catholic.  The evangelical expression of justification was not some aberration but the reclamation of what had been lost or overshadowed by other truths and not a few lies.

All the more tragic, therefore, was the Roman reaction on the front which was most important to the reformers, the message and teaching of the church. This had to be reformed according to the word of God; unless it was, no moral improvement would be able to alter the basic problem. Rome's reactions were the doctrinal decrees of the Council of Trent and the Roman Catechism based upon those decrees. In these decrees, the Council of Trent selected and elevated to official status the notion of justification by faith plus works, which was only one of the doctrines of justification in the medieval theologians and ancient fathers. When the reformers attacked this notion in the name of the doctrine of justification by faith alone—a doctrine also attested to by some medieval theologians and ancient fathers—Rome reacted by canonizing one trend in preference to all the others. What had previously been permitted (justification by faith and works), now became required. What had previously been permitted also (justification by faith alone), now became forbidden. In condemning the Protestant Reformation, the Council of Trent condemned part of its own catholic tradition.


As Pelikan points out in his seminal work Obedient Rebels, it was not the rejection of heretics but the banishment of its own catholic identity that was at work in the Reformation in its response the Counter Reformation.  Yet Lutherans run the risk of doing the very same thing when they reject their catholic identity and forget the centuries of church life and thought that went before the tragic necessity of the Great Reformation.  If we would be so bold as to challenge Rome to recognize the catholic identity of our confession, we must allow others to challenge us to see beyond the the sixteenth century.

Truly both options could not be allowed to stand -- justification by faith alone or justification by faith plus works.  They were conflicting truths that weakened the Church and her witness to the world.  But in resolving this conflict, the authority must rest with Scripture and not with the pious opinions of theologians whether ancient or eloquent.  This was Luther's point.  Let the conflicting ideas be sounded forth in debate and let the voice of God's Word decide.  Not council, not pope, not theologian but Scripture must choose which is authentic, which is faithful, and which is true.  Luther did not hide his convictions but put them forth and Rome should have been prepared to do the same.  Instead we ended up with a breech and a schism and now with competing camps each claiming to be the right one.

Lutherans have become too institutionalized in their Lutheran identity and speak as if Reformation was the greatest moment in history.  It was tragic and however necessary it will always be as tragic as it was necessary.  Rome has become institutionalized in its Counter Reformation and so has amputated part of its own catholic faith and identity -- even anathematizing it. No matter the careful steps tried to reconcile in the Joint Declaration of the Doctrine of Justification, Lutheranism cannot live with justification by grace through faith as being a minority opinion and Rome cannot erase its own history of rejection.  So we delicately dance around what remains -- is justification by grace through faith THE teaching of Scripture or is justification plus works what Jesus came to die for and what St. Paul commends as truth?


And so we celebrate one more Reformation.  Lutherans needing to know and celebrate their history before 1517 and Rome needing to know and celebrate the reform rooted in the Gospel and the faithful corrective to what had become a mish mash of conflicting ideas about how we are made right before God.  Can we give thanks for the Reformation without looking down our noses at those who gave Luther the boot?  Can we proclaim the Reformation truth as not just one permitted opinion but the defining issue and the doctrine on which the whole Church stands or falls?  And the catholic faith is this... ought to be the start of the preaching on this day and the start of every conversation to reclaim Protestantism from its abyss of relativity and Rome from its rejection of what Scripture teaches...


View article...

Saturday, October 29, 2011

FW: Temptations Preachers Face

Cyberbrethren…

 

Feed: Cyberbrethren Lutheran Blog Feed
Posted on: Saturday, October 29, 2011 5:00 AM
Author: Paul T. McCain
Subject: Temptations Preachers Face

 

I've been thinking a lot lately about the quality of the preaching in the pulpits of our church and I am growing increasingly concerned that we are moving further and further away from the unique strengths of Lutheran preaching as we have received it from generations previous to ours. I'm going to frame my concerns by referring to temptations preachers face. I'm coming at this, of course, from my perspective and convictions as a confessing, orthodox Lutheran, committed to the Sacred Scriptures, having vowed to preach and teach the Word of God in conformity with the Lutheran Confessions as contained in the Book of Concord. As you'll see, this is no mere finger pointing exercise, this is also a chance for me to reflect on how these temptations impact me when I preach.

The Therapeutic Temptation
The "Therapeutic Temptation" is one that would have preachers use their sermons to give what amounts to little more than a pep talk, often in the context of cute, touching, emotional or an otherwise manipulative story, either real, or made up. I'm referring to the infamous, "There was once a little boy who…" or the, "There was a man who said/did…" These sermons will be marked by a preaching of Law that is soft and squidgy around the edges, it's not a preaching of God's holy, righteous wrath against sin and a warning against it and a rebuking of sin and sinners. It is Law preached in such a way that bad things, bad people or bad situations are lamented in doleful tones. It sounds often like this, "Isn't it sad when…." or "Have you ever….." and the tone is one of sounding "oh, so sorry about that" and "shouldn't we all feel bad" about this problem. Then the sermon goes on to offer encouragement and support for getting out of our bad and negative feelings and circumstances. The Law is soft, the Gospel therefore comes across as antidote to feeling sad and bad. I face this temptation when I preach. I want so much to make people feel better, to feel good, to leave feeling positive. That can get in the way of good Law/Gospel preaching. I would say this is what I'm hearing more and more in pulpits. Law becomes simply lament. Gospel becomes simply encouragement and reassurance.

The Entertainment Temptation
Public speaking, once becomes fairly good at it, is a place where one's personal ego can really get in the way of God's Word. It is so tempting to get wrapped up in the moment and begin to feel a need to amuse, delight and entertain the listeners. Now, granted, the use of the classic art of rhetoric is important, but it is tempting for preachers to work very hard to elicit a laugh, a chuckle, to amuse, to entertain. They mistake audience reaction with effective preaching and they mistake emotionally manipulating the congregation with preaching God's Word effectively. The problem with the entertainment temptation is that often the effort to entertain and elicit a positive emotional reaction from the congregation causes the preacher to neglect the doctrine in the text he is preaching on, to neglect, frankly, the Scriptures, and to spend an inordinate amount of time developing his story that he just knows will get the kind of response he is looking for. Public speaking is heady stuff. I have been tempted to go for the cheap line, the little quip, the comment I know will get chuckle and spend too much time on that, than on preaching God's Word. And here again, in this context, Law is neglected, or ignored, because, after all, the Law is not "upbeat" it is not "entertaining." It will not delight and amuse people to hear that they, by nature, are poor, miserable sinners who have nothing but wicked, evil deeds to offer to the holy and righteous God. And when the Law is neglected, the Gospel then loses the force of its power to convert and regeneration. In such a context, the Gospel is watered down to be part of an entertaining experience for the listeners.

The Hurry It Up Temptation
This is quite an insidious temptation that I think we all have fallen into, nearly totally. For many centuries, and even millennia, in the church's history, sermons, where they were taken seriously, were thirty, forty or even sixty minutes long. The sermon was the opportunity for the pastor to preach and teach God's Word carefully and thoroughly, from Sunday to Sunday, but then, and here I'm speaking only of my own church body, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, sermons that were forty-five minutes long, became only thirty minutes, then they dropped to twenty minutes, and now it is often the case that sermons now are only twelve, or ten or even eight minutes long. Simply put, these are no longer sermons, they have become rather formulaic quick devotional thoughts. There is not enough time carefully to delve into the text, and open it up to hearers. A text become more a pretext for the sharing of what becomes quite repetitive themes: some talk of something bad (Law), some talk of Jesus taking care of it all for us (Gospel) and then reference to the Sacrament. I'm tempted to do this when I know that there is a full service with communion. It is tempting to skip lightly over the text and instead use the short time I have to make a couple devotional points and then get on to the Sacrament. For all I love the Sacrament of the Altar and love that we are celebrating it more often, the Sacrament of the Altar must never become an excuse to make our sermons shorter and less substantial. We are the church of Word and Sacrament, not word AND SACRAMENT. I think that we are forgetting this.

The Grind My Axe Temptation
This temptation is characterized by a preacher managing to "find" in any Biblical text, a pretext for him to yet, once more, grind his axe on his hobby-horse issue, or subject, or theme, no matter what it might be. The hobby-horse might be quite correct and what the preacher says about it is quite true, but it is a temptation preachers face to turn nearly every sermon they give into an opportunity once more to repeat the same issues, over and over again. Perhaps he will be wanting to talk always about the liturgical practices in the parish, to turn every sermon into a little discourse on some point of church history, or to keep referring to some particular event or trend in society. Every sermon manages to include a reference to the issue that is really "bugging" the preacher and it comes out in his sermon. I am tempted to do this when I find myself wanting to warn people against the "feel good/health and wealth" prosperity preachers. I find that I can easily find myself bashing this error in every sermon. And while I'm perfectly correct in my warning, it is not appropriate for me to hijack every sermon on every Biblical text, to interject my own particular agenda. The lectionary is a good corrective, and if the preacher resolves actually to preach on the subjects, issues and topics that flow naturally from the lectionary readings, there is much less of a chance that the preacher will fall victim to the "Grind My Axe" temptation.

Do you have more temptations to add to this list?


View article...

FW: For Orthodox Lutheran Pastors

A hymn…

 

Feed: Lutheran Hymn Revival
Posted on: Saturday, October 29, 2011 2:01 PM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (Amberg)
Subject: For Orthodox Lutheran Pastors

 

This hymn is written for all orthodox Lutheran Pastors, especially those who have been wrongfully removed by their congregations from the office into which Christ placed them.  God hears your prayers; may God have mercy on those congregations and those in authority who have incurred God's wrath.

 

The tune is "Ach bleib bei uns"

Paul preaching to the Jews in Damascus - 12th C. Mosaic

 

1.

Lord God preserve your ministry

Against all sin and heresy,

Send down Your Spirit from above

To guard Your pastors with Your love.

 

2.

 

Of all the men who dare to teach,

How few there are who purely preach - 

 

But see how poor and weak they are

Who wield Your Word and wage Your war!

 

3.

But You have promised them your grace

Who call on you in every place;

And You have called them here below

To heed Your call and plant and sow.

 

4.

Give them your law to plow the clay,

And break all self-deceit away,

Then let the broken hearts receive

The seed that makes the heart believe.

 

5.

And let Your pastors patient wait,

Nor think that You are coming late,

But water with Your Spirit's Word,

Until the ends of earth have heard.  

 

6.

For in due season they shall reap,

If now they watch and do not sleep,

And keep your doctrine as their torch

To guard the treasures of your Church.

 

7.

For woe to him, when Christ shall come,

Who lets the thief break in our home

And rob the treasures of His Bride,

And cast His Word of truth aside! 

 

8.

But blest is he who toils in tears

Until the Pastor reappears,

To gather to Himself His sheep

And dry the eyes of those who weep.

 

9.

"Well done, you good and faithful slave!

You ran the race your Savior gave;

A crown of righteousness is yours,

And open stand your mansion's doors.

 

10. 

Then will the prophets sing with you,

Apostles with the martyrs too,

With all the saints and heavenly host,

"Praise Father, Son and Holy Ghost!

 





View article...

Friday, October 28, 2011

FW: [Sturm] Creating Wikipedia Books

From Sturm…

 

Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 10:14 AM
To: Tech-Geeks Mailing List
Subject: [Sturm] Creating Wikipedia Books

 

 

I realize that Wikipedia isn't highly esteemed as an infallible
resource, but there are instances where the content can be helpful or
provide leads.

Anyway, I came across this option which I hadn't known about: merge
and download Wikipedia articles or create a Wikipedia book which can
be "published"

http://goo.gl/T12Hk

OR

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=rendering&return_to=FreeCell+%28Windows%29&collection_id=9607d956513c1c7e&writer=rl

The goal of education is a wise and eloquent piety.

Subscribe:  Sturm-subscribe@yahoogroups.com 
Unsubscribe:  Sturm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

FW: Theological Dialogue with Other Christian Church Bodies

WMLT…

 

Feed: Witness, Mercy, Life Together.
Posted on: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 5:23 AM
Author: Al Collver
Subject: Theological Dialogue with Other Christian Church Bodies

 

In light of the third installment of dialogue between the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) and The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), October 27–28, which focuses on "Contemporary Issues Facing the Church in North America," it is good to consider the new document produced by CTCR staff titled, "Theological Dialogue with Other Christian Church Bodies." The document explores why it is good to engage in theological discussion with other church bodies, even if immediate fellowship is not foreseen. President Harrison requested the CTCR staff to study whether it is permissible and beneficial for the LCMS to engage in such discussions with other Christians. The result is the document below.

– Rev. Albert B. Collver, Director of Church Relations

Theological Dialogue With Other Christian Church Bodies-Adopted 09-17-11


View article...

FW: The Benefit of Reading Multiple Bible Versions

….Including Hebrew and Greek…

 

Feed: School of the Solitary Place
Posted on: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:18 PM
Author: Walter Hampel
Subject: The Benefit of Reading Multiple Bible Versions

 



During my seminary days back in the 1990s, one of the classes I was required to take was Biblical Hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is a word we usually don't use in everyday conversation. Perhaps the class title should have been what the original class name really means...Biblical Interpretation.

 

The professor who taught the class was a man named Haskell Stone. He had been a Christian for many decades. I'm thankful for not only his academic knowledge of guidelines for correctly interpreting the Bible but also what he could teach us in the class based on his experience as a believer in Christ.

 

The one piece of counsel he gave us that has stuck with me over these years has been that we should systematically, over time, read through different translations of the Bible. Professor Stone remarked that the slight differences in the way in which a translation renders certain words and phrases could give us a broader understanding of what the Bible means in a given passage. I have taken up the challenge. Over the years, I have read through the Bible in the King James Version, New International Version and the New American Standard Bible translation. During this year, I have been reading through the English Standard Version.

 

Following through on Professor Stone's advice to us has really been a blessing. There are variations in these four translations which in many passages provide a depth of meaning of which I would not be aware had I not read that passage in a different translation. These variations can happen for a number of reasons.

 

One of those reasons happens to be the method in which a translation was made. Of the four translations which I have read, the King James version is probably the most literal translation (i.e. word for word) among the four. The New American Standard and the English Standard Version are also translated more literally, but in contemporary English and not the English of 400 years ago. The New International Version is translated as a "dynamic equivalence" work. This means that a priority is given to translating the Bible in an "idea for idea" method.

 

Sometimes, there are variations in the way that one biblical manuscript will read from another. These "textual variants" can occur for a number of reasons (which I may explore in this blog at another time). The overwhelming number of variations occurred due to a difference in spelling or simply repeating a word when visually copying a manuscript by hand. However, some variations reflect what a scribe may have thought a word meant rather than the word itself. One example can be found in Jude 1:5. In most of the translations I have read, there is a reference to the Lord saving a people out of Egypt. However, in reading the English Standard Version, the manuscripts from which it was translated used the word "Jesus" and not "Lord". That really grabbed my attention. Really early in church history, some scribe correctly understood that while God saved His people out of Egypt, since Jesus is God, Jesus saved His people out of Egypt.

 

In reading the Bible, one big help can be reading a translation with cross-references and a list of the textual variants all in one place. In 1 Peter 2:24, we read: "and He Himself (Christ) bore our sins in His body on the cross, so that we might die to sin and live to righteousness." The versions of the New American Standard have those cross-references and alternate readings. In some manuscripts, the word "cross" is replaced with "wood." When I discovered this, the meaning of this verse took on a deeper signifance for me. Jesus was placed upon the wood of the cross. However, to read this passage as Jesus was laid on the wood, the imagery of the burnt offerings referred to in the Old Testament really comes out. Jesus being laid on the wood reminds us that of all the Old Testament burnt sacrifices which needed to be done over and over again, Jesus performed one sacrifice perfectly (once for all according to the book of Hebrews).

 

There are many other examples which I can raise. First, let me encourage you to read the Bible, in its entireity from Genesis to Revelation. Once you have read through the entireity of a translation of the Bible, please consider doing another full reading in another translation. You will be presented with a deeper sense of what God is telling you in the text. It is worth the effort.


View article...

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

FW: How The Gospel Saved My Life

Moe Tchividjian…

 

Feed: Tullian Tchividjian
Posted on: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 5:41 AM
Author: Tullian Tchividjian
Subject: How The Gospel Saved My Life

 

A couple months ago Drew Dyck, managing editor of Leadership Journal, came to Ft. Lauderdale to interview me about the 2009 merger of New City Church (the church I planted in 2003) and Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church. As has been well documented, it was an incredibly painful and tumultuous year. It was the year that God brought me to the end of myself, broke my legs, and taught me grace. It was the year that the gospel saved me 18 years after I became a Christian.

The whole story of how I discovered the practical power and punch of the gospel during that agonizing year is the subject of my new book Jesus + Nothing = Everything. The book is an autobiographical record highlighting how God helped me rediscover the now-power of the gospel in the crucible of excruciating pain.

In the latest issue of Leadership Journal, Drew captured the heart of what happened that  year in an interview he did with me entitled War and Peace, and he highlights how I survived a leadership coup by finding rest in the liberating power of the gospel.

Here's an excerpt:

I was realizing in a fresh way the now-power of the gospel—that the gospel doesn't simply rescue us from the past and rescue us for the future; it also rescues us in the present from being enslaved to things like fear, insecurity, anger, self-reliance, bitterness, entitlement, and insignificance. Through my pain, I was being convinced all over again that the power of the gospel is just as necessary and relevant after you become a Christian as it is before.

When that biblical reality gripped my heart, I was free like I had never felt before in my life. It gives you the backbone to walk into a room full of church leaders and say "this is what we're going to do and this is why we're going to do it, even if it gets me thrown into the street."

There is a fresh, sanctified I-don't-care-ness that accompanies belief in the gospel. Whether you like me or not doesn't matter, because my worth and my dignity and my identity are anchored in God's approval. Christ won all of the approval and acceptance I need.

You can read the whole thing here.

I really, really hope and pray that this story will be an encouragement to struggling and discouraged pastors. I know that many of your stories are worse than mine. It doesn't seem fair to me that just because I come from a well-known family and inherited a well-known church, that my story gets told and yours doesn't. But I've talked with many of you over the last two years and your stories have encouraged me tremendously.

God knows how deeply grateful I am for all of you pastors who are feeling empty and all by yourself. Brothers, I am with you–side by side; back to back.


View article...

FW: Rev. Dr. C.F.W. Walther Bicentennial (1811 – 2011)

Walther…

 

Feed: Gnesio
Posted on: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:19 AM
Author: Gnesio
Subject: Rev. Dr. C.F.W. Walther Bicentennial (1811 – 2011)

 

Celebrate, study and discover the ministry and the legacy of the Rev. Dr. C.F.W. Walther, the first president of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), during the Walther Bicentennial. Many LCMS entities and congregations will recognize the bicentennial of Walther's birth with special events, activities and resources starting in 2011 and extending through the 125th anniversary of his death in 2012.

Walther joined the Saxon Germans who immigrated to the United States in 1839 (the date of arrival), and at the age of 27 found himself leader of the group that settled in Perry County, Missouri. In 1847, Walther played a key role in the founding of the LCMS, which now ranks as one of the largest Christian denominations in the United States with more than 2.3 million baptized members in some 6,200 congregations and more than 9,000 pastors.

Find out more about Walther, "The Father of the Missouri Synod," and his lasting leadership. Join the celebration.

http://www.lcms.org/walther200

See also:

  1. LCMS Bicentennial Lectures
  2. Walther on Communion Fellowship
  3. Submit a Research Paper on CFW Walther
  4. A Letter from the President of the LCMS


View article...

FW: Thanksgiving for Light I

Oremus…

 

Feed: Stand Firm
Posted on: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:00 AM
Author: Scott Diekmann
Subject: Thanksgiving for Light I

 

We praise and thank you, O God, for you are without beginning and without end.

Through Christ you are the creator and preserver of the whole world; but above all, you are his God and Father, the giver of the Spirit, and the ruler of all that is, seen and unseen.

You made the day for the works of light and the night for the refreshment of our weakness.

O loving Lord and source of all that is good, mercifully accept our evening sacrifice of praise.

As you have conducted us through the day and brought us to night's beginning, keep us now in Christ; grant us a peaceful evening and a night free from sin; and at the end bring us to everlasting life through Christ, our Lord.

Through him we offer glory, honor, and worship to you in the Holy Spirit now and always and forever and ever.

Amen

From LW, p. 291

photo credit: Stuck in Customs


View article...

FW: Wii Pray?

Video game humor…

 

Feed: Sentire Cum Ecclesia
Posted on: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:53 AM
Author: Schütz
Subject: Wii Pray?

 

Tonight we set up Mia's new "Wii" machine on the telly. She has been saving for it herself, and has finally reached the required figure thanks to birthday gifts towards her efforts. So we all had a bit of fun designing the "Mii's" before it was time for prayers, stories and bed.

One of the girls made the comment that "we should have a prayers program for the Wii".

"I wonder if there is such a thing," I said, having no idea if the Americans had not come up with just that. So I googled "Wii Prayers" to see what came up and hit this. It is, of course, a hoax, but we did have a bit of a giggle!

PRAYER WORKS INTERACTIVE LAUNCHES MASS: WE PRAY. NOW YOU DON'T HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL SUNDAY TO WORSHIP THE LORD.

Boston, Mass., November 17, 2009 – Prayer Works Interactive is pleased to announce the launch of Mass: We Pray, a revolutionary videogame that allows families to go to church every day from the comfort of their own home. After all, a family shouldn't have to wait until Sunday to worship the Lord.

Mass: We Pray is the first of many worship-themed games in development for Prayer Works Interactive. Just like with any videogame, families can use a television as a monitor to play. Then, they can use the CROSS, a proprietary, wireless, cross-shaped controller to participate in 24 unique and exhilarating rituals. Make the Sign of the Cross, sprinkle Holy Water, take Collection and even give Holy Communion. Every motion and nuance of a blessing or ritual is detected in three dimensions and replicated on-screen.

As they play, gamers collect Grace points. Then they can trade them in to unlock the Holy Mysteries. It's entertaining, educational and enlightening.

To get off the couch and into the action, add the KNEELER, a pressure-sensitive accessory that allows gamers to kneel or genuflect just as they would in Church.

To extend the experience even further, download the Seven Sacraments and Holy Rituals Expansion Pack featuring: Ash Wednesday, Confession, Holy Procession, Transubstantiation and much, much more.

According to the founders of Prayer Works Interactive, "Families shouldn't be scared of videogames. Just like television and radio before that, it's not the medium that's dangerous; it's how you use it. Mass: We Pray is proof that videogames can be used to spread the Good Word."

Don't miss this revolutionary launch, coming Easter 2010. Visit masswepray.com for more information.

With Mass: We Pray, you can bring your family closer. To Heaven.

About Prayer Works Interactive

Prayer Works Interactive is a new game-development company founded in Boston in 2007. We believe there is a lack of quality games based upon traditional family values. Our mission is to fill that void by creating engaging, top-quality games that entertain, inspire and bring families closer to the Lord. Our first game is Mass: We Pray, but look for many more in the months to come.

 


View article...

Monday, October 24, 2011

FW: Quotes on the Internet

J

 

Feed: Beggars All: Reformation And Apologetics
Posted on: Monday, October 24, 2011 1:23 PM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (James Swan)
Subject: Quotes on the Internet

 


ht:SamWi.


View article...

FW: For the one house of worship destroyed in 9-11

 

Finally…

 

Feed: Pastoral Meanderings
Posted on: Monday, October 24, 2011 4:54 AM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (Pastor Peters)
Subject: For the one house of worship destroyed in 9-11

 

From the RNS:

Ten years after tiny St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church was destroyed by falling rubble from the World Trade Center towers, church leaders reached an agreement Friday (Oct. 14) to rebuild at Ground Zero.

The church, founded by Greek immigrants in 1916, sat in the shadow of the twin towers and was the only religious building to be completely destroyed during the 9/11 attacks.

Under the agreement brokered by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, the church agreed to drop a lawsuit filed in February against the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which controls rebuilding at Ground Zero.

The agreement marks a major win for the tiny church, which insisted on sticking to a preliminary agreement to exchange their original location at 155 Cedar Street—now part of a vehicle security center—for a larger piece of property at 130 Liberty Street.

The agreement allows the church to build a 4,100-square-foot church and interfaith bereavement center at 130 Liberty Street in exchange for dropping all litigation against city officials.

"With this agreement, we are continuing New York's collective healing, restoration, and resurgence," Cuomo said in a statement. "Now we are finally returning this treasured place of reflection to where it belongs."

Port Authority spokesman Steve Coleman said construction on the church is scheduled to begin in 2013, once underground modifications are made to the future church site.

Stavros Papagermanos, a spokesman for the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, said some funds have already been raised for reconstruction, but could not say how much the project would cost or how long it would take.

Negotiations over rebuilding broke down in 2008 as church officials accused the Port Authority of ignoring the church in the reconstruction plans. The Port Authority, in turn, accused the church of ever-escalating demands.

The church said it had been promised $20 million and the parcel at 130 Liberty Street because the vehicle security facility made the church's original site no longer viable. Last year, the Port Authority said it supported "the return of the church to its original home" on Cedar Street.

Cuomo intervened earlier this year, appointing engineers to study alternate sites for the church. A statement on Friday from the Port Authority said the study concluded that "structural issues could be resolved" to build the church at 130 Liberty Street.

As part of the agreement, the Port Authority will pay for all below-ground construction and the church will pay for anything built above ground. "There will be no payments made by the Port Authority to the church," the statement said.

Officials said construction will also have no impact on the World Trade Center site.

"Our pledge is to be a witness for all New Yorkers, that freedom of conscience and the fundamental human right of free religious expression will always shine forth in the resurrected St. Nicholas Church," said Archbishop Demetrios, leader of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America.


View article...


View article...

FW: The most relaxing–and most boring–music ever

 

Weightless…

 

Feed: Cranach: The Blog of Veith
Posted on: Monday, October 24, 2011 4:00 AM
Author: Gene Veith
Subject: The most relaxing–and most boring–music ever

 

Scientists measuring brain waves have discovered the most relaxing piece of music ever, an artificially composed tune called "Weightless."  It's so relaxing that they are warning people not to drive while listening to it.  To say it's relaxing is  another way of saying that it's the most boring tune ever.  You can listen to it, below, if you dare.

British band and a group of scientists have made the most relaxing tune in the history of man, an Mp3 of which is at the bottom of this article.

Sound therapists and Manchester band Marconi Union compiled the song. Scientists played it to 40 women and found it to be more effective at helping them relax than songs by Enya, Mozart and Coldplay.

"Weightless" works by using specific rhythms, tones, frequencies and intervals to relax the listener. A continuous rhythm of 60 BPM causes the brainwaves and heart rate to synchronise with the rhythm: a process known as 'entrainment'. Low underlying bass tones relax the listener and a low whooshing sound with a trance-like quality takes the listener into an even deeper state of calm.

Dr David Lewis, one of the UK's leading stress specialists said: "'Weightless' induced the greatest relaxation – higher than any of the other music tested. Brain imaging studies have shown that music works at a very deep level within the brain, stimulating not only those regions responsible for processing sound but also ones associated with emotions."

The study – commissioned by bubble bath and shower gel firm Radox Spa – found the song was even more relaxing than a massage, walk or cup of tea. So relaxing is the tune, apparently, that people are being Rex advised against listening to it while driving.

via Scientists discover most relaxing tune ever – Music – ShortList Magazine.

First of all, music or any art form is not supposed to be relaxing!  On the contrary, it's supposed to seize and focus your attention!  It is not a good thing when music puts you to sleep.  I defy you to listen to "Weightless"–an appropriate name, since the music indeed is weightless–all the way through (beware:  it's 8 minutes, which is part of what makes it so tedious, I mean, relaxing):

Marconi Union – Weightless


Powered by mp3ye.eu

 

HT:  Joe Carter


View article...


View article...

FW: C. F. W. Walther Festive Convocation: Watch Live!

FYI…

 

Feed: Witness, Mercy, Life Together.
Posted on: Sunday, October 23, 2011 8:42 PM
Author: Al Collver
Subject: C. F. W. Walther Festive Convocation: Watch Live!

 

(From Concordia Saint Catherine's Blog)

In honour of the 200th anniversary of the birth of C. F. W. Walther, first president of the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod, the seminary is holding a festive convocation:

C. F. W. WALTHER as Hymn-Writer, Hymnal Editor, Pastor, and Musician

The convocation opens with a narrated hymn festival on Sunday evening, 23 October, 7:00pm, featuring Resurrection Lutheran Choir. All are welcome to attend at no charge. On Monday, 24 October, the convocation continues with presentations by Rev. Jon Vieker, Senior Assistant to the LCMS President. If you have not already done so, please register your intention to attend by contacting Linda Lantz at the seminary. The registration fee of $25 includes a hot lunch.

Rev. Jon Vieker

If you are unable to attend in person, you may wish to watch live (or watch the recordings later) at:

www.lutheranchurch.ca/video.php

Tune in according to the following agenda (all times are Eastern Daylight Time):

Sunday, 23 October 2011

7:00pm "A Walther Hymn Festival"

Monday, 24 October 2011

9:00am Matins

9:30am "Walther as Pastor, Musician, and Editor: the First LCMS German Hymnal" (Vieker)

10:45am Break

11:15am "Walther's Hymns (and Agenda)" (Winger)

12:15pm Lunch, provided by seminary staff

1:30pm "From German into English: the German Hymn-writers of the First LCMS English Hymnal" (Vieker)

– Rev. Dr. Albert B. Collver, Director of Church Relations


View article...